Sygnum vs. Amina: The Thrilling Showdown in the Crypto Banking Landscape!

Back in August 2019, Switzerland made history by granting the world’s first banking licenses to two crypto banks: Sygnum and Amina Bank, which was then known as Seba. With a stellar lineup of investors and advisors backing them from the start, these two players set out to revolutionize the banking landscape.
Key Players and Their Backing
Sygnum boasts a roster of influential figures, including former Swiss National Bank Chairman Philipp Hildebrand and ex-UBS CEO Peter Wuffli. Meanwhile, Amina, under the leadership of Guido Bühler, who served as CEO from 2018 to 2022, also received substantial support from seasoned banking veterans like Andreas Amschwand. Today, Julius Bär Group continues to hold a significant 30 percent stake in Amina, with former SNB General Counsel Hans Kuhn on its board since 2019.
Current Standings
Fast forward five years, and both Sygnum and Amina have made notable strides but are marching to the beat of their own drums. Sygnum currently employs over double the staff of Amina, reflecting a more extensive operational framework. Ownership dynamics also differ: Sygnum remains largely founder-driven, while Amina is heavily bolstered by institutional support, especially from Julius Baer and Guy Schwarzenbach of Black River Asset Management.
Performance Metrics
In the latest results, both banks have seen revenue growth. Amina’s income surged by an impressive 74 percent, while Sygnum’s rose by 37 percent. Interestingly, almost half of Sygnum’s revenue derives from commissions and services offered through its B2B banking platform, which caters to over 20 partner banks, including Swiss state bank Postfinance. In contrast, Amina’s trading income mainly stems from proprietary trading of popular digital assets.
Cost Management and Financial Health
While Amina touts progress in cost reduction since its strategic overhaul in 2022, both banks remain well-capitalized. Sygnum reports a CET1 ratio of 17.48 percent, while Amina’s stands at an impressive 34.04 percent, demonstrating robust financial health. However, Sygnum’s advanced technology-centric model sets it apart, achieving EBITDA-positive status and edging closer to breakeven on net income.
Future Outlook
Looking ahead, these two pioneering banks are clearly on diverging paths. Sygnum’s investment in proprietary technology has forged a stronghold in the B2B space that Amina may find challenging to penetrate in the near future. While Amina is making strides with private banking clients and crypto-backed loans, its reliance on trading income may pose risks. Management seems conscious of this, turning its gaze toward international expansion and stable income channels.
As we peer into the future, the stories of Sygnum and Amina continue to unfold. With Sygnum cruising ahead, Amina has its work cut out, navigating a rockier road ahead filled with both challenges and opportunities.
Questions & Answers
What significant milestone did Sygnum and Amina achieve in August 2019?
In August 2019, Sygnum and Amina became the world’s first banks to receive banking licenses for cryptocurrency operations.
How does Sygnum’s revenue model compare to Amina’s?
Sygnum’s revenue predominantly comes from commissions and services offered through its B2B banking platform, while Amina mainly generates income through trading digital assets like Bitcoin and Ethereum.
What key strategy is Amina pursuing to expand its operations?
Amina is focusing on private banking clients and plans to expand internationally, particularly by leveraging MiCA passporting access to the EEA from Austria.